Factors to consider in bringing an action for civil theft in Florida. Florida Medical Malpractice and the Statute of Limitations Recent Trends In Director Liability Who Is At Fault in this Accident Understanding Attorneys' Fees in Florida Guardianships for Minors in Personal Injury Litigation Automobile Insurance: Getting the Best Coverage
|
736 So. 2d 151; 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9088, *; 24 Fla. L. Weekly D 1593 SUBSEQUENT HISTORY: [*1] Released for Publication August 4, 1999. As Amended August 2, 1999. PRIOR HISTORY: An Appeal from the Circuit Court of Dade County, Robert P. Kaye, Judge. LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. 96-17298. DISPOSITION: Affirmed. COUNSEL: Parenti, Falk, Waas, Hernandez, & Cortina and Gail Leverett Parenti, for appellants. Deutsch & Blumberg and James C. Blecke; Osherow & Schwartz and Mark R. Osherow and Kenneth J. Schwartz, (Boca Raton), for appellee. JUDGES: Before LEVY, GODERICH, and FLETCHER, JJ. OPINION: PER CURIAM. Because the plaintiff's expert witness' testimony created a conflict in the evidence, the trial court properly denied the defendants' motions for directed verdict. See Lawrinson v. Bartruff, 600 So. 2d 22 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Further, as to the remaining points raised by the defendants, we find that they lack merit. As such, we affirm the final judgment under review. Affirmed.
|
|